Friday, September 18, 2015

NEWS CONFERENCE: Obama expert Andy Martin reacts to the “Obama-is-a-Muslim” query at a Trump event in New Hampshire

Republican Party presidential candidate and Obama expert Andy Martin will hold a telephone news conference today, Friday, September 18th, to offer reaction to the New Hampshire town hall meeting where Donald Trump was confronted by a man claiming “Obama-is-a-Muslim.” Andy is the man whose original research in 2005 created the anti-Obama “birther” movement.
News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2016        
Republican candidate for
President of the United States       

“Make America Great Again”
                    www.AndyMartinforPresident.com
www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
National headquarters:
P. O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
New Hampshire Headquarters:
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NH 3105
Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329
Fax (866) 214-3210
E-mail:
Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com
Blogs:
www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com
www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Attention, Washington, National daybook/assignment and Political editors

Announcement of telephone news conference Friday September 18

Republican presidential candidate Andy Martin will hold a telephone news conference today, Friday, September 18th to discuss the “Obama-is-a-Muslim” incident at a Donald Trump Town hall meeting in New Hampshire Thursday evening

Andy exposed President Barack Obama’s Muslim family heritage ten (10) years ago

Andy says the “Obama-is-a-Muslim” matter is no longer a religious issue; Obama’s Muslim sympathies have become a political/cultural divide in American society

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

(Please feel free to forward and/or post this email)

(Miami) (September 18, 2015)  Republican presidential candidate Andy Martin will hold a telephone news conference today, Friday, September 18th to discuss the “Obama-is-a-Muslim” outburst at a Donald Trump town hall meeting in New Hampshire. Andy is a New Hampshire resident.

“I suppose it was inevitable that the ‘Obama-is-a-Muslim’ trope would surface in the 2016 presidential campaign,” Andy says. “The liberal media are in a frenzy over the question asked by an unidentified man at a Donald Trump town hall meeting. So that the full panoply of the ‘Obama-is-a-Muslim’ history maybe available, Friday I am providing ten years of perspective with current 2015 updates.”

1. What happened in New Hampshire Thursday night?

Thursday evening (September 17th) Donald Trump convened a town hall meeting in Rochester, New Hampshire. Genuine town hall meetings are risky business for political candidates. Any question can pop up, and a candidate has to know how to parry embarrassing questions. Despite his surplus of self-confidence, Donald Trump is still not an experienced candidate. In contrast, Hillary Clinton conducts bogus town hall meetings, where she pre-screens the persons in attendance and only answers questions pre-selected in advance. Trump did not have Clinton-style defense mechanisms in place Thursday night.

The first question to Trump came from a man claiming President Barack Obama is a Muslim, and stating that “training camps” are operating somewhere to kill Americans. (Please see link [1]).

I was watching the live feed. When I heard the question, I went “Oh, oh, how will Trump respond to this one?” Trump had three options. He could ignore the question; he could correct the questioner and he could respond in some form or fashion and try to move the town hall meeting along without a visible distraction. Trump chose the third option and essentially brushed off the questioner with a promise to “look into” matters in the future. In my opinion Trump was merely being polite and, indeed, so far as I am aware Trump’s meeting proceeded without any disruption or undue attention to the questioner.

We do not know if the questioner was a sincere believer in his question, or whether he was a Democratic Party saboteur. Democrats routinely use dirty tricks in New Hampshire; they were recently caught making phony campaign calls. Or perhaps the questioner was a saboteur from another Republican campaign.

At this point we do not know who he was or what the questioner’s agenda was. Interestingly, no one in the media seemed to want to identify the questioner or verify if he was even a Trump supporter. Instead, TV bobbleheads began to flay Trump and to demean his supporters as “birthers.” Within moments Chris Matthews on MSNBC went ballistic. CNN followed.

So what are the facts about Obama’s religion, and why have “Obama-is-a-Muslim” beliefs survived for a decade since I first created them?

2. My work exposing Obama, starting ten years ago in 2005

Ten years ago in August, 2005 I inadvertently created the “birther” movement by providing factual scholarly research about Barack Obama, who was then a U. S. Senator. My writing morphed into “Birtherism.” Birtherism eventually became identified with the claim Obama was born in Kenya, a claim which Barack and Michele Obama have encouraged. The claim was false. As hucksters sought to pyramid lies upon lies about Obama’s origins I walked away from the movement I had accidentally created.

I have, however, continued my scholarly research into the facts about Barack Obama’s life. Next week when I head to Honolulu to examine the nuclear threat from North Korea to Hawai’i I will also be continuing my scholarly research into Obama’s family history.

A. The facts about Obama’s life and religion

In 2005 I used my worldwide investigatory resources to look into the facts about Barack Obama’s history. My findings were initially delivered in news conferences (please see [2]). Over the years, here is what I have found:

(a)  Barack Obama was born in Hawai’i. I have never seen any credible evidence that could stand up in a courtroom to establish any claim to the contrary.

(b) Barack Obama’s putative father was a Muslim. His father was buried as a Muslim. The president’s grandfather was a Muslim convert.

(c) Obama candidly disclosed to Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times that Obama had worshiped as a Muslim during the years when young Obama lived in Indonesia.

(d) Under Islamic law, a child automatically assumes the religion of his father. Therefore, as a matter of Islamic law, Barack Obama became a Muslim at birth.

(e) Many of the people Obama referred to as “family” during his recent visit to Kenya (in 2015) are also Muslims.

(f) Obama moved in with his grandparents at the age of ten; his grandparents did not have an active religion.

(g) There is no evidence that Obama was ever baptized.

(h) I attempted to obtain baptismal records for Obama from Trinity United Church in Chicago and they did not provide any. Because Obama was not baptized as a child, he would have had to be baptized as an adult. There is no record of any baptism.

B. What is a Christian?

(a) Unlike Islam, Christianity is an open religion. You become a Christian through Holy Baptism, but baptism is available to children and adults alike. Was Obama ever baptized? We don’t know. He won’t say.

(b) Notwithstanding the formal requirement of Holy Baptism to become a Christian, a requirement that is observed at Trinity United Church, Christian churches will recognize someone as a “Christian” who professes to be one. So putting aside all of the ritual and formality, you can be a “Christian” simply by saying you are one.

(c) So is Obama a Christian, or did he become one at some unidentified date in the past? The answer is yes. Saying he is one effectively makes him one.

(d) After the Obama family moved into the White House, local African-American churches expected him to attend. He does not. Obama worships at the Episcopal church across the park from the White House and does so only rarely when he is shamed into doing so.

3. The 2008 Campaign

During the 2008 presidential campaign Obama’s family history and religious history were legitimate issues. But Republican leaders were afraid to raise them. Regrettably, the senior citizen who was nominated by Republicans to oppose Obama did everything he could to elect Obama. John McCain essentially collapsed and surrendered to Obama. McCain muzzled Sarah Palin, who wanted to fight Obama. Republicans were justifiably outraged.

Thursday night (September 17th) the liberal media were again playing an excerpt from the 2008 campaign in which McCain said Obama was a “nice man.” Obama was not a nice man in 2008, not then, not now, not at all. But the media loved McCain for betraying the Republican Party.

After McCain effectively ended his campaign, Obama started attacking me as the leader-by-default of the opposition to Obama’s election. Obama sent his thugs on national TV to smear me with lies and distortions. In October, 2008 I filed the first lawsuit in Honolulu to open Obama’s birth certificate to public scrutiny, triggering a firestorm that still endures today.

In 2012, we saw more of the same surrenderitis by Republican leaders. Republicans nominated a hedge fund huckster to oppose Obama and Mitt Romney followed the McCain playbook, refusing to take off the gloves and oppose/expose Obama. That is why Romney is now a private citizen instead of the president. Once again, loyal Republicans were outraged at the betrayal.

4. Obama in office

After taking office in 2009 Obama promptly went to Cairo and apologized to Muslims for American history. Obama’s “apology tour” further enraged Republicans and conservatives. Obama went to Saudi Arabia, where he bowed to and kissed the hand of the Saudi king. Many Americans remember these events, with disgust.

5 “Obama-is-a Muslim” believers have become a political movement, and opposition to him is no longer a religious matter

I suppose it was inevitable that in an open and unstructured town hall meeting in New Hampshire the “Obama-is-a-Muslim” movement would surface. But opposition to Obama is no longer primarily a religious belief system. Islam, of course, is both a religion and a cultural discipline, a “lifestyle” if you prefer.

Opposition to Obama today is centered on his support for radical Islam. Putting aside my criticisms of the Bush family, ISIS, the Islamic “caliphate,” came into being under Caliph Obama, not George W. Bush. Chaos in the Middle East is an Obama production.

Is it any surprise that “Obama-is-a-Muslim” believers are still among us? And, once again, liberal media are trying to discredit Americans for holding to a belief system that may not be based on “fact,” but is surely based on the “evidence” of the six years of chaos Obama has created within the United States and abroad. Obama refuses to use the term “radical Islam.” He pretends radical Islam does not exist. He has forced federal law enforcement agencies to kow’tow to political correctness concerning Islam. With every round of Obama’s pro-Islamic program, public resentment has continued to fester.

Thursday night the boil burst in Rochester, New Hampshire.

Stay tuned. The media may be feasting on their renewed birther bashing. But Obama-the-Christian-or-Muslim-or-nothing-at-all is going to leave behind an endangered America and a world in chaos in January, 2017. It’s enough to make you pray.

Footnote: my regular readers are aware that in 2008 I went to Honolulu and confronted Obama in a great Honolulu showdown. I presented the theory (not fact) that Obama’s father may not have been Obama, but rather Frank Marshall Davis. In which case Obama was not a Muslim at birth and is only a pseudo-Muslim. In my opinion, and it is only an opinion, not a proven fact, Obama may be living a lie, just not the lie the anonymous man in New Hampshire believes in.

I am often asked why I continue my scholarly research in HHHHHawai’i. I persist because we have not even scratched the surface in learning the truth and the facts about Barack Hussein Obama. I may not share the views of the man who questioned Donald Trump Thursday night. But I understand why people are frustrated and why they believe the political system and the Republican Party have failed them. That’s why although I have no expectation of wining the nomination I remain a back-up Republican candidate for president.

Despite the fact that everything I have written about Obama over the past decade has proven to be correct, the liberal media continue to pummel me for publishing the truth. Republican national leaders have proven to be ineffective in stopping Obamanation, probably because “there are none so blind as those who will not see, none so deaf as those who will not hear.” The American people are angry and want answers. The media are not providing them. That explains the success to date of Mr. Trump.

Notes: Andy is in Miami building his “war room” to oppose Jeb Bush.

Copies of Andy’s book on Obama are available from the publisher (see below).

-----

September 18th [TELEPHONE] News Conference Details:

WHO:
         
Republican presidential candidate and Obama expert Andy Martin

WHAT:
    
Andy Martin responds to an “Obama-is-a-Muslim” incident at a Trump event in New Hampshire

WHERE:

Telephone news conference:

Dial-in Number: 1-800-466-8543

Conference Code: 510518

WHEN:

Friday, September 18th – 2:00 P.M. (EDT)

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-birther_55fb5d2ee4b08820d918202a

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/19/us/politics/donald-trump-obama-muslim.html?

[2]


New citations after emailing:

WHAT OTHERS SAY ABOUT ANDY MARTIN:

One author has called Andy Martin the “big kahuna” of the anti-[Barack] Obama movement. Another said “Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film: sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…” Another says, “The only American journalists that are ‘standing UP’ [to Obama] are, Andy Martin…”

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-seven years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over forty-five years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

----------


© Copyright by Andy Martin 2015 – All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

BULLETIN: GOP presidential candidate Andy Martin reacts to the CNN presidential candidates’ debate

GOP presidential candidate and media analyst Andy Martin watched the CNN debate Wednesday. With forty-seven years of television experience Andy offers his informed opinions on issues which you may not see developed and discussed in the mainstream media.  Read what he has to say and see if you agree with him.

News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2016        
Republican candidate for
President of the United States       

“Make America Great Again”
                    www.AndyMartinforPresident.com
www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
National headquarters:
P. O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
New Hampshire Headquarters:
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NY 03105
Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329
Fax (866) 214-3210
E-mail:
Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com
Blogs:
www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com
www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

GOP presidential candidate Andy Martin provides his insight and analysis on the CNN debate

In the fifth of his “Letters From the 2016 Presidential Campaign” Andy offers his reactions to the CNN presidential debate

Andy has some interesting and independent observations on the CNN presidential candidates’ debate in California - see if you agree

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

(Miami) (September 17, 2015) Dear American:

I’ve been a little quiet for a few days. We’re down in Miami creating a “war room” to defeat Jeb Bush for the presidential nomination. More to come later.

I watched the presidential candidates’ debate Wednesday night. Here are some reactions you may not see in the mainstream media; they are presented in the form of short bullets so we could get them out quickly:

1. Donald Trump needs a debate coach

Donald Trump is a physically big man. Wednesday night he was slouched over his lectern. He often makes unhelpful facial gestures, as though he was unaware that he is continuously on camera. Physical posture is terribly important in a debate format. Jeb Bush and Trump are similar in size but Trump looked smaller on stage because of his poor posture. While Trump may believe the “rules” of politics do not apply to him, I am here to tell El Trumpo that the “laws of television,” which I popularized in 2008, do apply to him. Appearance is everything, which Trump, as an experienced television performer, should know. His poor posture and gestures detract from the power of his presence. Body language has a significant subliminal impact on viewers. Trump needs someone to coach him on his appearance (which is generally very good) and he also needs to be more prepared on the issues. He doesn’t need to know the names of obscure Middle East people; but he has to have a more substantial approach to “making us great again.”

Trump also made a blooper Tuesday night when someone on his team announced a “foreign policy” speech and he failed to deliver. If he cries wolf too often, media will stop paying attention.

2. Carly Fiorina’s face

Somewhere between two and three million people watch cable TV on the average night. Probably thirty million people tuned in for the CNN debate. So twenty-seven million people had little awareness of Donald Trump’s caustic comments about Fiorina’s “face” in, of all places, Rolling Stone magazine. I am sure Trump regrets making the boneheaded remarks. But people viewing only the debate must have been mystified what the “face debate” was all about. Maybe Trump has learned his lesson this time, maybe not. He is free to strike hard blows on his opponents, but he inflicts foul blows at his own peril. Meanwhile, the “face debate” has probably been put to rest.

3. CNN has changed political debates forever

The CNN debate was exciting to watch. It was great television. Cable TV bobbleheads were predicting the 11 candidates would be too unwieldy a group to manage. Jake Tapper did a masterful job. CNN has set a new standard for presidential debates. I don’t think media competitors can go back to the boring talking head-candidate format in the future.

4. Carly did well, but I remain skeptical

The liberal media types were profusely praising Fiorina after the debate. One of the commentators on CNN noted, however, that she failed to smile. I also found her appearance slightly cold and a bit hard for TV. She also needs a debate coach. Fiorina is a bright person and she is always well prepared. But she still has a bit too much of the demeanor of a business executive and not that of the TV performer she must be to win over the viewing audience. I remain skeptical on Fiorina although she had a good night Wednesday.

5. Bill O’Reilly nailed the Trump issue

After the debate I watched a smidgen of Bill O’Reilly. O’Reilly understands Trump in a way other media types do not. O’Reilly clearly told Carl Rove, “Trump changed the agenda of the campaign.” Trump has not only changed the course of the campaign, he has probably changed the course of American history. A “pathway to citizenship” is dead for illegal immigrants. Higher taxes for hedge fund types? They are now a bipartisan issue. Trump has exploded the chokehold which the “no taxes” lobby in the Republican Party has held over public policy for decades. Wait and see. I can’t say whether Trump will win or lose or what. It’s too early. But I am confident Trump has changed the trajectory of politics and government for the foreseeable future. Whatever his other limitations, Trump has become a transformational force.

6. The candidates flubbed the George W. Bush issue

Jeb Bush is still defending his brother. The other candidates flubbed the George W. Bush “issue.” Jeb said his brother “kept us safe.” That is simply wrong. Jeb’s claim is grossly wrong.

First, after 9/11 GWB diverted resources from pursuing Osama Bin Laden to bulk up for the insane invasion of Iraq. Second, GWB invaded Iraq, which I also opposed, and unnecessarily created a shambles in the Middle East, empowering Iran in the process. (For new readers, you may not be aware I not only opposed GWB, I predicted in 1999 he would start a war with Iraq. I lived in Baghdad a good part of 2003 and provided early warnings about the gathering storm, at a time when GWB was crowing “Mission Accomplished.” Finally, GWB, not Obama, was the one who worked out the irrational withdrawal schedule for Iraq. Obama was only too happy to default to Bush’s timetable. President Obama’s defense (to his own incompetence) is always that GWB was the one who signed the agreements withdrawing from Iraq. Obama is right. GWB was the one who falsely believed he had “succeeded” when his grand failure was still to be revealed in the future. George W. Bush did not “keep us safe” as Jeb falsely suggests. GWB has endangered this nation for a generation, or longer. GWB was the second worst president in US history (after, of course, Obama). GWB’s incompetence will haunt future presidents for decades.

7. Andy takes a bow - the mainstream media catch up with him

Way back on August 26th I observed that Trump’s demeanor had changed, and he was on his way to being a presidential candidate and maybe even a president. (See link [1] below.) Wednesday the New York Times (link [2] below) caught up with my analysis and also observed that Trump had changed. Wednesday night on MSNBC Washington Post writer Robert Costa also observed the change in Trump’s campaign approach. I like to say that we have “over the horizon” radar at www.ContrarianCommentary.com. And we have a long track record of predicting events -- days, weeks, months and sometimes even years in advance. Keep reading our “Letters” for an “over the horizon” view of the developing presidential campaign. As a candidate, analyst and writer we’ve got you covered.

Finally, just because you don’t hear from me from time to time, that doesn’t mean I am in a “low-energy” state. I am working tirelessly to defeat Jeb Bush as payback for the irreparable damage his family has done to this nation over the past several decades. The Bush family has enriched itself while impoverishing the United States and providing disastrous leadership. Jeb Bush must be demolished.

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]

https://andyforpresident.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/presidential-candidate-and-author-andy-martin-explains-why-donald-trump-is-showing-increasing-signs-that-trump-may-be-developing-into-a-president-in-the-making/

[2]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/us/politics/donald-trump-firework-of-campaign-trail-shows-a-more-measured-side.html?

New citations after emailing:

WHAT OTHERS SAY ABOUT ANDY MARTIN:

One author has called Andy Martin the “big kahuna” of the anti-[Barack] Obama movement. Another said “Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film: sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…” Another says, “The only American journalists that are ‘standing UP’ [to Obama] are, Andy Martin…”

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-seven years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see http://www.boycottabc.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over forty-five years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

----------

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2015 – All Rights Reserved

Thursday, August 27, 2015

BULLETIN: Presidential candidate and author Andy Martin explains why Donald Trump keeps attacking Megyn Kelly

Republican presidential candidate Andy Martin says that the continuing series of attacks between Donald Trump, Megyn Kelly and Fox News has a back story. Liberal media are fascinated by the contretemps between Trump and the so-called “conservative” news channel. Andy has known all of the major participants for decades and explains what he thinks is really going on.

News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2016        
Republican candidate for
President of the United States       
“Make America Great Again”
                    www.AndyMartinforPresident.com
www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
National headquarters:
P. O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
New Hampshire Headquarters:
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NY 03105
Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329
Fax (866) 214-3210
E-mail:
Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com
Blogs:
www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com
www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Republican presidential candidate and author Andy Martin explains why Fox News and Donald Trump are battling again

In the fourth of his “Letters From the 2016 Presidential Campaign” Andy explains why Donald Trump is attacking Megyn Kelly

Andy says Trump is using Kelly as a proxy for Fox owner Rupert Murdoch

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

(Please feel free to forward and/or post this email)

(New York)(August 27, 2015)  Dear American:

Wednesday night liberal foghorn MSNBC was filling the airwaves with discussions of the media’s latest conspiracy conundrum: why is Donald Trump continuing to attack Megyn Kelly? Rachel Maddow even rolled out ancient CBS News war horse Daniel Rather to opine. Maddow and Rather speculated Fox and Trump might have created an elaborate conspiracy where they attack each other for mutual profit. I doubt the existence of such a conspiracy.

In my opinion, there is a motive behind Trump’s attacks. I can’t say that my views are entitled to any greater weight than those of others, but there is one significant difference: I am the only one who has known many of the players for thirty years.

In the 1980’s, Trump and I ended up on a list of prominent New Yorkers. Again in the 80’s I was battling Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch’s lackeys and I tangled again in 2008. Murdoch was groveling to Barack Obama and ordered his flunkies to throw me under a bus, which they did. I have no love for Fox News or Murdoch, who I believe is increasingly senile.

While I am by no means an insider, I have been on the inside/outside of many media battles over the decades. And because of all of these tussles I can look inside the players to see what really motivated them. So here are my thoughts.

1. Who is a journalist?

Is Megyn Kelly a “journalist?” She calls herself one. Is Jorge Ramos a “journalist?” He also claims to be one. Neither of them are journalists, that is unless you define the term “journalist” into meaningless.

Ramos is a criminals’ advocate who agitates for a state of lawlessness across the United States. He is a media thug who is paid to arouse his audience and to keep his viewers in frenzy against the “gringos” that Ramos excoriates as the oppressors of his “community.” Ramos has a Castroite view of America; all he lacks is complaints of “Yanqui imperialism” to make him a full-fledged Fidel Castro acolyte. How Ramos acts has more in keeping with wearing a brown shirt and lederhosen than it does with the practice of journalism as the neutral reportage of news. Tuesday Ramos went to a Trump event to crate a disturbance, not to act in the role of a bona fide journalist. Ramos succeeded in creating a fracas. But he also blew his cover. Going forward, no genuine journalist should refer to Ramos as a legitimate “journalist.”

And where was Ramos on Wednesday night? Why on Megyn Kelly’s show attacking Trump. Surprise! Ramos won’t go on the O’Reilly Factor, also on Fox News, but he popped up on Kelly’s nightly shebang. Hmmm. What does Kelly have that O’Reilly lacks? Winners and losers at Fox News? Playing favorites? A conspiracy? You be the judge.

Kelly is an attractive, intelligent person who tried the practice of law and decided she could make more money appearing on TV. She has succeeded. She also claims to be a “journalist” but she is not. Kelly is an entertainer and she is by no means a free agent in what she says and does. She is merely a major actor in a kabuki drama that is orchestrated by Fox News to entertain conservatives every day and to make piles of cash for Murdoch every year.

I watch Fox News, and it is entertaining. Roger Ailes, who created Fox News, would like you to believe it is a “conservative” political outlet. And Fox hosts do indeed espouse conservative views from time to time. Some, like Sean Hannity, may even be true believers. But the straightforward goal of Fox News is to make money, lots of it, nothing more and nothing less. Rupert Murdoch is a businessman who will - in true Trumpian confessional fashion - do and say whatever it takes to make more money. Despite his increasing senility Murdoch still controls the Fox Empire.

2. Is Megyn Kelly really a free agent?

What most viewers do not realize is that TV “hosts” do not create their own programs each day. There is a vast army of people who labor behind the scenes. To be sure, Kelly and others like her help sculpt the final product, and they present the program on the air, which is why they are called “presenters” in England. But the “product” is actually produced as a collaborative effort behind the scenes, not in front of cameras.

When Fox and Sean Hannity needed me to make news and promote a program in 2008, they worked with me. When orders came down from Rupert Murdoch to have me shot, they took out their pistols and started shooting. Hannity, Kelly and others are not free agents. In reality, they do what they are told; and what they tell their viewers is often manipulated from behind the scenes by producers and corporate handlers.

Bottom line: what Kelly does (and I am not picking on her) is entertain. Journalism is not a part of her job description. That is merely her fantasy. Kelly’s producers create a list of guests and “contributors” and she guides her program with gestures and intonations intended to entertain. Before the now-notorious Fox News presidential “debate,” Kelly and others made a grand scene of telling us how they were “preparing.” It was all part of a dramatic ruse. Always lurking behind the public facade were the corporate bosses. And the corporate bosses were under orders to destroy Donald Trump. Because Rupert Murdoch wants to destroy Donald Trump.

The “debate” questions that were directed at Trump were not “tough” questions as they were falsely portrayed. They were smears intended to demean Trump in front of the other candidates. The tactic backfired with the actual viewing audience. People could see that Kelly and Chris Wallace were asking unfair questions of Trump and asking relative softballs of the other candidates on the stage. The others were asked about “issues;” Trump was asked questions about personal matters that were taken out of context and intended to demean him and distort his image. After the debate I wrote about the dirty tactics of Fox, and I only repeat now because Trump still does not trust Fox News to be fair.

3. Who is Trump’s real Target?

After the debate debacle boomeranged on Fox News Roger Ailes tried to make nice by calling Trump. A truce was declared, or so it seemed.

Why did a new round of accusations erupt earlier this week prompting Trump tweet new attacks against Kelly, and prompting  new round of accusations against Trump from Fox News management? Here are the facts: Rupert Murdoch is apparently sailing off the coast of Australia on a luxury yacht, bored, restless and itching for a rematch with Trump. I am not suggesting Murdoch is gaga, but he is on the road to gagadom. All along, Murdoch planned to play king maker, and to select one of the GOP “16” as his champion for the White House campaign of 2016.

Trump exploded Murdoch’s strategy by coming on strong and pushing the other “candidates” out of the media’s eye. Like many super-wealthy people in declining years and with declining powers, Murdoch is frustrated, probably angry and trying to reverse the pending collapse of his grand political plan. Trump is proving to be a much more durable and acceptable candidate than Murdoch ever imagined he could be.

And despite being a little gaga, Murdoch loves to tweet. Murdoch has not hesitated us his Titter account to attack Trump. Over the weekend, Murdoch damned Trump with faint praise, claiming Trump was now a “serious candidate.” What Murdoch really meant was that Trump is a serious threat to Murdoch’s grand strategy. Murdoch went on to raise the ante by promoting a new idea, that former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg should run as a presidential candidate, though of which party it is not clear.

Murdoch’s tweet of a Bloomberg candidacy was merely a tweak intended to irritate Trump, and Trump did not take long to respond. Within a day of Murdoch’s move, Trump fired back by renewing his attacks on Kelly. Here is why my analysis comes into play.

Trump is no fool, and he also has an impish streak (which many do not understand and falsely attribute to malevolence). Trump knows that Kelly is the “crown jewel” of the Fox News prime time lineup. Why would Trump attack Murdoch, when many people have no idea who Murdoch is and Murdoch himself may not have any idea where he is (for the record, off the coast of Australia)?

Rather impishly, Trump chose to attack Kelly, whom everyone knows and with whom he had already had a fracas. Roger Ailes could and probably should have ignored Trump’s latest machinations but Ailes either could not restrain himself or orders came from the yacht sailing off the coast of Australia to retaliate against Trump with a searing response whose intensity bore no relationship to Trump’s mischief.

And so it goes. Apologies are demanded, and denied. Charges are made and put aside. Kissing-and-making-up is a constant process. The “great game” for supremacy in the 2016 presidential race between the egos of Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch continues unabated.

At least my theory makes sense. With all due respect to Dan Rather and Rachel Maddow, theirs does not. Tit-for-tat is one of the oldest of tactics.

We have not heard the last from Murdoch, a King Lear-like figure sailing off the coast of Australia and lamenting Trump’s usurpation of the 2016 presidential campaign. And we have not heard the last from either faux journalists and criminals’ advocates such as Ramos, or smooth and suave entertainers such as Kelly. Luckily, I’m the outsider who can give you the inside analysis even while I campaign as a presidential candidate to advance my own agenda of issues.

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/08/murdoch-wants-bloomberg-to-enter-the-2016-race.html

[2]

http://time.com/4009565/murdoch-bloomberg-president/

New citations after emailing:

WHAT OTHERS SAY ABOUT ANDY MARTIN:

One author has called Andy Martin the “big kahuna” of the anti-[Barack] Obama movement. Another said “Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film: sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…” Another says, “The only American journalists that are ‘standing UP’ [to Obama] are, Andy Martin…”

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-seven years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over forty-five years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2015 – All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Presidential candidate and author Andy Martin explains why Donald Trump is showing increasing signs that Trump may be developing into a president-in-the-making

Republican presidential candidate Andy Martin says that Tuesday night in Dubuque, Iowa Donald Trump may have crossed the Rubicon from candidate/politician to president. Andy says that Trump’s news conferences and speeches, while still flawed, are improving markedly. Trump’s manner of handling the hooliganism of Jorge Ramos showed Trump is growing into the presidential role, much as Ronald Reagan did after February 23, 1980 when he asserted his rights as a candidate. Andy is also proud to announce he is hoping to combine his “letters” on the campaign into a book, and has started looking for a publisher.

News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2016        
Republican candidate for
President of the United States       
“Make America Great Again”
                    www.AndyMartinforPresident.com
www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
National headquarters:
P. O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
New Hampshire Headquarters:
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NY 03105
Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329
Fax (866) 214-3210
E-mail:
Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com
Blogs:
www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com
www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Republican presidential candidate and author Andy Martin says Tuesday night in Dubuque, Iowa, Donald Trump “crossed the Rubicon” from politician to president

Andy says that Trump had his “Ronald Reagan moment” when he refused to be bullied by Jorge Ramos of Univision

In the third of his “Letters From the 2016 Presidential Campaign” Andy explains why Ramos’ boorish behavior may boomerang

Andy announces a new book project, “Blue Collar Billionaire: Donald Trump’s quest for the presidency”

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

(Please feel free to forward and/or post this email)

(New York)(August 26, 2015)  Dear American:

As I started writing this letter after Donald Trump’s Dubuque speech, preparing to present my take on Trump’s “Ronald Reagan moment,” I kept monitoring the cable channels. Don Lemon and Douglas Brinkley on CNN had the same reaction I did. CNN played the clip from February 23, 1980 when candidate Ronald Reagan grabbed a microphone and asserted his control over a campaign event (please see link [1] below). Reagan was on his way to the White House.

Jorge Ramos, a pompous anchor of Univision, went to a Trump news conference, being held before a Trump speech in Dubuque, to create a disturbance (please see links [2][3] below).

First of all, it is important to note that Univision clearly and indisputably breached a contract with Trump. Second, because a lawsuit is pending between Trump and Univision, the parties are strictly speaking not supposed to meet without lawyers present. So Trump can legitimately refuse to interact with Univision employees while the lawsuit is pending.

Ramos was there to create a media moment, and he did. When Trump called on another reporter Ramos stood up and started delivering a diatribe. Trump had Ramos ejected for being rude and obstreperous.

In 1980, Reagan crossed the line from candidate to president when he asserted his control of the microphone at a campaign event. August 25th, Trump crossed the same line from candidate to president.

If you watch Trump’s speeches it is impossible to ignore his constant improvement both in delivering a speech and in conducting a news conference. Tuesday night he looked presidential in answering questions. When Ramos tried to disrupt the news conference, Trump calmly had him removed. After his trip to the penalty box Ramos was allowed to return. He got to ask a series of questions while still continuing to pontificate.

Let me start by explaining a developing bias on my part. I have watched the Black Lives Matter group disrupt political meetings and I don’t like it one bit, even though I deeply believe in the underlying theme that Black Lives Matter.

Likewise, I am growing weary of endless threats from Hispanics/Latinos to disrupt the 2016 presidential election by voting for candidates who support Latino demands that the United States surrender its sovereignty and allow uncontrolled illegal immigration.

Increasingly I see the matter the way many attendees at Trump events must see the Latino disruptions. What gives you the right to demand a right to break our laws? If you are a legally registered voter, i.e. a citizen, then your loyalty is to American law, not Mexico, Central America or anywhere else in the world. The idea that U. S. citizens are agitating for people from another country to be allowed to violate our laws is deeply disturbing to me as I believe it is to every loyal American. Yes, loyal American. My loyalty is to the red, white and blue, not the nations from whence my family came in earlier generations. I am very proud of my heritage, but I claim no right for people from my heritage countries to come here and break the law.

The media deride the feelings of Trump supporters. I think Trump is being truthful and authentic when he says he loves Hispanics. But as a potential president he realizes respect for the law is a cornerstone of American citizenship and American strength. And of a winning campaign. When Jorge Ramos stood up and started acting like an ass, instead of a journalist, and started delivering a speech and demanding to be heard, I was not impressed. I am very much not impressed by people who find Ramos’s behavior acceptable.

It is about time to remind Latinos/Hispanics that when they were either born here or took the oath of allegiance to the United States, they surrendered all loyalty to their former countries, and they should start acting as Americans instead of as foreign agents.

Trump played beautifully against Ramos’ boorishness. In fact, if Trump could have paid Ramos to deliver Ramos’ act, he should have done so.

I well remember the same liberal media types that used to call Reagan a “movie actor” and are now deriding Trump. The American people do not like media arrogance and yes, they don’t even like media arrogance and corruption when it is delivered by Fox News (see below for my upcoming analysis of the Trump/Kelly drama).

Trump still has to up his game as a speaker. He may think he is a great speaker but he has a lot to learn. He can speak without notes; that’s great. But he needs to deliver his ideas more concisely and more crisply. His speeches have improved markedly and if he keeps improving he will be very formidable as we move into September.

But Mr. Trump is learning to be a president. He proved that to me in Dubuque, Iowa, a town I know well. President Reagan, meet president-in-the making Donald Trump.

Some news from Andy about his campaign:

When I announced my own campaign for the Republican presidential nomination I made it clear I did not expect to win. Rather, I am advancing a series of agendas in which I passionately believe, such as preserving the New Hampshire primary, protecting the memory of Alexander Hamilton and other issues. If someone wants to invite me to a debate or meeting or speech, I am happy to appear as a candidate. If not, well, I am not going to “Pull a Ramos” and try to disrupt an event. I have serious issues which motivate me, not the least of which is a strong desire to see that the Mexican-American candidate for president, Jeb Bush, is not nominated. And, like Donald Trump, I am enjoying myself. Immensely.

I have spent my entire life “in the arena,” on the playing field. But I am primarily not a player, I am a writer and analyst, if a clandestine one at that. Over the past few days, as I have watched the Trump campaign unfold I have thought, “there is a great book in all of this.” Whether Trump wins or loses he has changed the course of America, forever. So I am hoping to take the letters I am writing, of which this is one, and combining them into a book, “Blue Collar Billionaire: Donald Trump’s quest for the presidency.”

My book on Barack Obama (see below) became the original bible on “Barry O.” I knew Obama from the streets of Chicago, I knew him as no one else did. And I have known Trump or watched him for 36 or 37 years, when I approved his first lease as he moved from Queens into Manhattan into a condominium where I served on the board of directors.

I have started looking for a publisher and an expanded budget. I will remain a candidate into next year, until the Republican nominee is chosen, whom I will almost certainly support (unless it is Bush). And I will also be active as a writer on the campaign trail. Please wish me well.

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]

http://www.mrmediatraining.com/2012/01/10/flashback-ronald-reagans-new-hampshire-media-moment/

[2]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/25/and-then-donald-trump-kicked-tvs-most-influential-latino-newsman-out-of-a-press-conference/?hpid=z1

[3]

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/25/at-trump-event-univision-reporter-is-snubbed-ejected-and-debated/?

New citations after emailing:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/08/26/jorge-ramos-is-a-conflict-junkie-just-like-his-latest-target-donald-trump/

WHAT OTHERS SAY ABOUT ANDY MARTIN:

One author has called Andy Martin the “big kahuna” of the anti-[Barack] Obama movement. Another said “Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film: sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…” Another says, “The only American journalists that are ‘standing UP’ [to Obama] are, Andy Martin…”

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-seven years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over forty-five years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2015 – All Rights Reserved