Showing posts with label Newt Inc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newt Inc. Show all posts

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Psychological Profile of Newt Gingrich: Gingrich is unfit for the presidency says Andy Martin

Five years ago Independent Republican Presidential Candidate Andy Martin produced a precedent-setting “Psychological Profile of Barack Obama.” Andy accurately analyzed and predicted how and why Obama would become a failure as president. Now Andy’s team has studied Newt Gingrich’s long history of sexual psychosis. Andy predicts Gingrich may be “the most dangerous political figure in America today.” Andy says Gingrich’s decades of abuse of women reflects deep-seated psychological problems. Newt Gingrich: the unfit presidential candidate.



NEWS FROM:


ANDY MARTIN /2012


“He Can Do More for New Hampshire



New Hampshire’s Favorite Son candidate


for President of the United States



www.AndyMartinforPresident.com


www.AndyMartin.com


www.FirstRespondersOnline.us


E-mail: Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com


P. O. Box 1851


New York, NY 10150-1851


Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329



Blogs:



www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com


www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


www.StopNorthernPass.blogspot.com


www.StopNorthernPass.wordpress.com


www.YouTube.com/Martinin2012



To become a regular subscriber to our campaign emails please send an email to Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line.



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:



“Gingrich Week Psychological profile”



Republican Presidential Candidate Andy Martin: Newt Gingrich is a sexual psychopath whose underlying personality structure renders him unfit for the White House



The same team that produced a devastatingly accurate “Psychological Profile of Barack Obama” five years ago now analyzes Newton Gingrich and finds Gingrich psychologically unfit for the presidency



(New York) (December 10, 2011)



WARNING: This column and news analysis/Psychological Profile discusses sex. If you are squeamish about sexual matters or believe a candidate’s personal life has no place being analyzed then read no further. If you would like to know why a leading team of analysts that produced an uncannily accurate Psychological Profile of Barack Obama in 2007 now feels Newt Gingrich is psychologically unsuited for the presidency, read our opinions and give us your opinions.



TAKE ONE: Five years ago my research team began developing a Psychological Profile of Barack Obama. If you go back and read our analysis of Obama’s psyche, you will find we accurately predicted why Obama was unqualified for the presidency and why he would be a failure. (The profile can probably still be found on the Internet, and is the first chapter in my bestselling book on Obama—see below)



TAKE TWO: People sometimes get uncomfortable when the discussion turns to sex. On the other hand, most candidates for public office, and particularly the White House, treat their personal lives with some degree of self-respect and discretion. That has not been the case with Newt Gingrich. Newt Gingrich has left behind many sexual “markers” than can be analyzed. In producing this analysis we did not spy on Gingrich or go through his garbage. We applied straightforward psychological and analytical techniques to the available undisputed facts, to produce a profile that would or could be produced about any foreign leader.



TAKE THREE: Irony of ironies. The final working draft of this profile was prepared on Thursday, December 8th. Friday, a Washington Post columnist came out with remarks that parallel our analysis and conclusions (link below). While Michael Gerson does not dwell on Gingrich’s sexual escapades, our extended review of Gingrich’s sexual misconduct provides a devastating insight into his overall state of mind and only compounds the basis for declaring Gingrich unfit for the presidency.



TAKE FOUR: As a presidential candidate with an extensive background in research, interpretation and analysis, you can accept or reject my conclusions as you wish. We have done the research and sifted the evidence. No, I’m not a professional “sex researcher,” although I have had dinner with Dr. Ruth a few times. But I have long worked with organizations that dealt in information gathering and used all of the tools at their disposal to compromise potential sources and extract information from them.



TAKE FIVE: “It’s not about the sex.” Rape is not a sexual act. It is an act of aggression and hostility. The physical attack is incidental to the mental dysfunction. Likewise, sexual misconduct is not about the sex. Newt Gingrich’s long history of sexual abusiveness and exploitation provides a piercing insight into his character and personality.



TAKE SIX: One of Gingrich’s favorite alibis is acknowledging his past misconduct, as though his acknowledgment can erase the misdeeds. Or, his defenders will say, “It happened a long time ago.” Gingrich's misconduct did not happen in high school and it did not happen in college as part of fraternity pranks. Gingrich’s self-destructive and abusive sexual behavior was being flagrantly displayed, virtually in public, in his thirties and forties when he was a few heartbeats away from the presidency. Saying he is a “grandfather now” cannot erase Gingrich’s underlying personality structure. Gingrich’s dysfunctional mind can’t be changed as simply as changing a couple of flashlight batteries. If you don’t believe me, ask a psychologist or psychiatrist. He or she will largely agree with the conclusions expressed in this profile.



TAKE SEVEN: Candidates today are held to higher standards than in the recent past. President John F. Kennedy would never make it into high office, sleeping as he did with crime syndicate prostitutes and making a joke of his marriage to Jackie Kennedy. Bill Clinton was caught in the transition from the “old ways” to the modern era. Clinton relentlessly lied about his infidelities. But in retrospect, Clinton was a pathological liar and equally unfit for the presidency.



Today politicians cannot cheat on their wives and conduct sexual exploitation of their employees or friends without the risk of paying a high price if they are discovered. The 24-hour news cycle is constantly on the lookout for new and sensational stories about misconduct by candidates and elected officials. Just ask Herman Cain if you don’t believe me.



TAKE EIGHT: Gingrich’s sexual misconduct rises to the level of a personality disorder. His mental disorder is still there, locked inside Gingrich’s brain. The fact that his current wife keeps him under virtual lock and key, and won’t allow him out of her sight for an extended period, is rather telling evidence that she knows what Gingrich would do if left alone.



TAKE NINE: In going over Gingrich’s history what appalled me the most was the report, never denied, that Gingrich was essentially having sex in public, in the back seat of his car, in the driveway in front of his home. Gail Sheehy, who is famous for her psychological analyses, wrote “The Inner Quest of Newt Gingrich” in 1995 for Vanity Fair. She reported on the sexual infidelities and shameless exhibitionism that took place when Gingrich was in his late 30’s. Newt was not a kid at the time.



“Experimentation” may be the wrong word to use, but for want of a better term experimentation describes what many teenagers and college students do in their late teens and early twenties. But a married man in his late thirties, with two children, who is having “public” sex in the back seat of a car parked in his front yard, is psychologically sick.



Gingrich’s physical activity was not “sex” in the conventional use of the term. His misconduct was compulsive and self-destructive behavior. His own staff told Sheehy that Gingrich’s sexual abuses may have been a reason why Gingrich did not run as well as he could have in his early campaigns for office.



Twenty years later, in the late 1990’s, Gingrich was still cheating on his (new) spouse and still engaging in indiscriminate sexual activity with his own employees in the U. S. House of Representatives. Gingrich was a precursor to the recently notorious and now former Congressman Anthony Weiner.



The fact that Gingrich married one of his strumpets, Callista, is no excuse for his misbehavior. His sexual misconduct was not a “fling;” rather, it was part of decades of aggressive, abusive, predatory and indiscriminate sexual misconduct. In short, Gingrich’s “sex” was not sex, it was evidence of serious, deep-seated psychological infirmities.



TAKE TEN: Gingrich’s exhibitionism and his apparent belief “the rules do not apply to me” behavior has not disappeared from his mind even if Callista now has enough sense to keep him under her personal surveillance. (When was the last time she allowed Gingrich on the campaign trail alone and overnight?)



The corrupted structure of the business empire Gingrich has created since leaving congress, and his grandiose manner of making charges against others (“Jail Barney Frank for his Freddie Mac involvement;” while Gingrich himself was on the payroll of Freddie Mac), reflect an ideation that the normal rules do not apply to Gingrich. Gingrich is as psychologically sick today as he was in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. (Watch for future columns on Newt’s financial malpractice and greed.)



TAKE ELEVEN: Gingrich still cannot admit and still cannot accept his sexual psychosis. Earlier this year (see link below) he tried to explain away his sexual misconduct by claiming it was committed “because he was so busy working for America.” Sure Newt.



TAKE TWELVE: Gingrich’s sexual misconduct reflects that he is addicted to high-risk behavior. While he can’t go around gang-banging congressional staffers any more he tries to gang-bang the presidential race with outrageous and inflammatory promises and proposals. Some viewers see Gingrich on TV and assume his blather is evidence of great profundity. On the contrary, Gingrich is just mouthing off in every direction because he knows that Republicans are frustrated with Obama and enjoy the “bad boy” routine Gingrich offers.



TAKE THIRTEEN: Gingrich’s addiction to exhibitionism and self-aggrandizing behavior would in all probability lead him to gridlock the nation in 2013 the same way he gridlocked the congress in 1995. Gingrich-as-president would soon become a bore to Gingrich himself. He would be looking for ways to trigger “transformational” (one of his favorite goofy words) actions and “big deals,” all of which could probably speed up the decline and destruction of the United States as we know it. He would probably start a new war to become “a wartime president.”



TAKE FOURTEEN: President Richard Nixon had problems. While Nixon may have been the brightest man to serve as president in the last century, and he left behind a legacy of legislative and foreign policy accomplishments that will be viewed favorably, Nixon also engaged in self-destructive behavior in the Oval Office. Nixon’s inner demons, like Gingrich's inner demons, destroyed Nixon because he could not deal with the stress of controlling his anti-social and hostile impulses.



Gingrich’s abusive treatment of women should frighten every Republican woman who is thinking of voting for him. Gingrich’s admitted sexual misconduct over the decades reflects contempt for women right into his 30’s and 40’s, a period in an adult’s life when his or her identity is normally well-established. Gingrich’s anti-social attitudes do not disappear just because he has “become a grandfather.” In fact the mendacity with which he still approaches the American people, telling them he was a “historian” for Freddie Mac, reflect that Gingrich is still lying about himself and still lying to himself.



TAKE FIFTEEN: The bottom line: Gingrich's sexual misconduct is very persuasive evidence that his underlying personality structure is unstable and that he would make grandiose and self-destructive decisions if he were to be elected president. Because Gingrich is superficially intellectual, and appeals to people though the use of his “big words” and “big promises” and "big ideas," he may be the most dangerous political figure in America today. He has already fooled many unsuspecting voters in 2011. Will he fool you?



You can take this psychological profile to the bank if Gingrich's “amnesia carnival” for the White House extends into 2012. Gingrich is a “leader” who went right to the top of our government and then failed utterly when he was just a few steps from the presidency as Speaker of the U. S. House. He was removed from office by his own caucus.



TAKE SIXTEEN: Although we mistakenly believe we live in a media-saturated world there is actually less actionable information available today than there was in the recent past. The mainstream media are just as liberal as ever. But today we have “conservative media” (such as Fox News, which is not conservative at all, but simply mendacious) and “liberal media” (such as MSNBC) that program to the biases of their audiences. Because these “new media” outlets are intentionally biased and engaged in blatant “narrowcasting” to the prejudices of their potential viewers, people in Iowa or New Hampshire or South Carolina know very little concerning the disturbing facts that are exposed and disclosed about Gingrich in Washington.



The “local media” in early-voting states are also “uninforming” voters just as they have always done about national politics. The current “media memory” about Gingrich goes back about 90 days, while his misdeeds go back decades. In the case of a fatally flawed candidate such as Newt Gingrich the lack of adequate historical context and background information has fueled the Gingrich boomlet and allowed people to suspend any inquiry into his long and sordid history in pubic office.


TAKE SEVENTEEN: I am a candidate for president. I do not work for any other campaign, have no connection with any other campaign, and my views are solely my own. All of my critical information about candidates is produced by my internal campaign team. I am running because I believe we need a Republican presidential candidate with the proven “street smarts” to take on Barack Obama. Since I wrote the first column debunking Obama in 2004 I have continuously exposed and analyzed Obama’s unfitness for office. If you want a candidate with the experience and the fortitude to take on Obama hand-to-hand, I am the only presidential candidate that fits the bill.



If you don’t trust the other Republican presidential candidates, or don’t like them, take a chance and vote for me. At least you’ll get the “straight stuff” from my campaign. And, unlike Gingrich, who claims he wants to confront Obama in 2012 but was nowhere to be seen during the 2008 campaign when Obama was elected, I actually walk the walk as well as talking the talk.



You have a choice of candidates. Be aware. Be informed. Be critical. Go to my campaign web site for extensive information. If you do your due diligence as a voter I think you’ll agree I should be on your short list of candidates for consideration.



Newt Gingrich should not be on that list.



Note: We have renamed “Grinch Rich Week” as “Gingrich Week.” Gingrich Week may last more than a week because we have more than enough negative factual material to sustain a multi-week series of reports.



--------------------------



MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329
E-MAIL: Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com



ujntsman wasd reelected in November, 2008. A few monrths later he resigned to serve
his president,” Barack Obama. SDo whyh was it so terrible that Palin resigned and Hutsman served evenless of his secondterm? Can I say “double standard” again.



What os this show us? Whetyher thessue s resigfnaitonsor religion,th emedia shamlessly create double standards tgo favr theiiberal medioa pets (fulldisclosure; I am ot aliberalmedia pet).


--------------------------


Please Donate:



www.AndyMartinforPresident.com


--------------------------


LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):



http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/


newt-gingrichs-lack-of-discipline/2011/12/07/gIQAbVjagO_story.html?hpid=z3



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newt/vanityfair1.html



http://marriage.about.com/od/politics/a/gingrichn.htm



http://voices.washingtonpost.com/compost/2011/


03/newt_gingrichs_patriotic_urges.html



--------------------------


ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago. His mom was born in Manchester. Growing up, Andy spent summers in New Hampshire. That’s why he’s New Hampshire’s “Favorite Son” presidential candidate in the 2012 presidential primary election.



Today Andy is a legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. Chicago Public Radio calls Andy a “boisterous Internet activist.” The Chicago Tribune calls him “Chicago’s own…political activist.” He has over forty years of background in radio and television. He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and he produced the Internet film "Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and international events with more than four decades of investigative and analytical experience both in the USA and around the world.



Andy has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois and American politics and courts for over forty years. [www.AndyMartin.com] He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.EnglishforAmerica.org



He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

UPDATES:
www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com.


ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com



[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]


--------------------------


© Copyright by Andy Martin 2011 – All Rights Reserved


--------------------------


Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Andy Martin comments on the New Hampshire Union Leader’s shameful endorsement of Newton Gingrich for president

Independent Republican Presidential Candidate Andy Martin calls the New Hampshire Union Leader the “Cheshire Cat of presidential politics. “The smile is all that remains,” Andy says. “Any political influence is long gone.” The Union Leader’s “endorsement” of Newton Gingrich for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination may actually backfire and doom the Gingrich candidacy. Andy says the Union Leader’s endorsement of a crook like Gingrich for president embarrasses New Hampshire residents.



NEWS FROM:


ANDY MARTIN /2012


“He Can Do More for New Hampshire



New Hampshire’s Favorite Son candidate


for President of the United States



www.AndyMartinforPresident.com


www.AndyMartin.com


www.FirstRespondersOnline.us



E-mail: Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com


P. O. Box 1851


New York, NY 10150-1851


Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917) 664-9329



Blogs:



www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com


www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com


www.StopNorthernPass.blogspot.com


www.StopNorthernPass.wordpress.com


www.YouTube.com/Martinin2012



To become a regular subscriber to our campaign emails please send an email to Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line.



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:



Andy Martin says the Union Leader’s endorsement of Newt Gingrich for president shames the people of New Hampshire



Andy says Union Leader executives are out of touch with reality, and incompetent journalists who did no meaningful research and analysis before backing Gingrich



Andy says the Union Leader’s arrogance and contempt for New Hampshire voters may backfire



(NEW YORK) (November 30, 2011) I call myself the “Favorite Son” candidate for New Hampshire Republicans and there is a reasonable basis for this claim. My mother was born in Manchester, my grandparents are buried there and I have spent my entire life coming to New Hampshire for vacations and family events. My memories of Manchester go back to 1951 when I attended he funeral of Father Emilianos Paschalakis at Assumption G. O. Church. So unlike the other presidential candidates who breeze in and breeze out, I was raised with New Hampshire values in my veins.



I have also grown up for the past sixty years listening to ridicule and complaints about the New Hampshire Union Leader (then the Manchester Union Leader). While the rest of the journalism and media world moved on to responsible reporting and commentary, the Union Leader has retained its crackpot orientation as a “voice” without any roots in rationality or reason.



I have been campaigning across the state for almost a year and I find no evidence the UL has any measurable influence. Rather, the newspaper’s reputation has become like a “Cheshire Cat” situation where only the smile remains. To provide local “color” the national media report on the UL's activity. But New Hampshire residents completely ignore the newspaper. The Union Leader's circulation (40,000 - 60,000 newspapers, six days a week) has shrunk to the point of irrelevance.



The UL’s latest outburst also confirms why the print media are dying in America. Print editors tend to be pompous, self-important asses. While all news coverage is to some extent slanted, the UL glories in presenting biased and unbalanced coverage of both its perceived friends and enemies.



Unfortunately for the Union Leader’s writers, the real world exists alongside the parallel delusional universe of the UL and its editors.



That is why the “endorsement” of Newton Gingrich for president shames New Hampshire residents and to some extent shames legitimate journalism as well.



TAKE ONE: The Union Leader is entitled to its opinions. I do not for one minute suggests that the newspaper should support someone they don’t believe in, or that we have anything more than a “buyer’s veto” of the paper by ignoring the UL as so much of New Hampshire does today.



TAKE TWO: Just as the UL is entitled to its opinions, I am also entitled to my opinion. My opinion is based on extensive research and analysis of both Newt Gingrich's past and, more importantly, his current methods of operation (2000 – 2011). In my opinion Newton Gingrich is a professional political crook whose whole career up to the present day and present month has been characterized by unethical conduct and corrupt activity. Political crooks don’t go to jail as often as ordinary burglars and muggers; perhaps that is why American government is in such a sad state today.



TAKE THREE: By endorsing Gingrich, the Union Leader is shaming the state and suggesting that New Hampshire residents are ignoramuses and sympathizers with corruption and ethical misconduct. On the contrary, New Hampshire is a state that has traditionally held to the highest standards of public integrity. There is a complete disconnect between Newton Gingrich’s sleazy political career and the ethics and values of New Hampshire residents.



Take Four: Is the Union leader endorsement likely to sway many votes? It is more likely to backfire, by forcing voters to look behind the endorsement and consider the reality of Newt Gingrich's sordid political career. If Joe McQuaid and his self-styled conservative weenies have any influence on the primary they may create an unintended anti-Gingrich backlash. (Reminder: when I am not a presidential candidate I am the executive editor of an Internet newspaper called www.ContrarianCommentary.com.)



TAKE FIVE: Why do I think the Union Leader’s endorsement of Gingrich is not merely wrong but actually “shameful.” Because the UL’s analysis of why it is supporting Gingrich is not anchored in factual reality or political reality.



TAKE SIX: In addition to making a laughingstock of New Hampshire, the Gingrich campaign is also likely to humiliate evangelical Christians. Especially in Iowa where conservative Christians are an influential part of the Republican base, the “explanations” that are being given for Gingrich’s immorality and his habitual traducing of his marital vows are a disgrace to conservative Christianity. “Forgiveness” is Christian. But just because you forgive someone’s transgressions does not mean you then ignore the past and promote the transgressor into an even higher level of temptation.



Gingrich has admitted he could not handle the stresses and temptations of high office. In fact, he gave his official duties and his “love for America” as excuses for committing adultery. Do Republican Christians now propose to support Gingrich so he can be temped again, and fail again? Bill Clinton was a moral failure in Arkansas. Moving him into the White house did not improve his morals. The same is true for Gingrich.



TAKE SEVEN: Recently, in denying that he had served his first wife with divorce papers in a hospital, Gingrich admitted he had taken a check list for their divorce to the hospital for her to sign while she was still recovering from surgery. While a check list may not be a legal document, the callous disregard for his wife's illness was confirmed, not denied, by Gingrich’s latest round of excuses. Who takes a divorce checklist for a hospital patient to sign? Newt Gingrich. It is commendable that Gingrich's daughters have forgiven their father and established a strong relationship with him. But the fact that Gingrich is a “grandfather” has no logical connection to his fitness to serve in the Oval Office. Conservative Christians are undermining their own moral authority by flirting with Gingrich for president.



TAKE EIGHT: I began exposing Gingrich’s corruption was back in March:



http://andyforpresident.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/


atlanta-news-conference-republican-andy-martin-


says-newt-gingrich-violates-federal-laws/



The facts about Gingrich’s contempt for the law are well known if not yet widely circulated. I am not suggesting I have “secret” reasons for exposing his criminality.



In a nutshell, what Gingrich does is collect money from “little people,” through his blathering self-important tax exempt organizations and then siphon those tax-exempt contributions into his private, profit-making operations so he can live the life of Washington royalty. Gingrich spent millions on jewelry and millions more on private jets, all courtesy of the little people who are duped into supporting his lifestyle by making small donations to “Newt, Inc.”



Gingrich is famous for issuing bogus invitations to people, trying to get recipients to donate $5,000 to him so they can be recognized as “leaders.” Gingrich targets senior citizens with his blarney, because seniors are especially vulnerable to his form of mail order flattery and seduction.



When I call Gingrich a crook, I mean crook.



So why did the Union Leader endorse a crook for president?



Well, if you read between the lines of Joe McQuaid's commentaries, Union Leader writers seem to “know” and “like” Gingrich. In other words, Gingrich's flattery works. Is “liking” and “knowing” a sound basis to endorse someone for the presidency? I think not.



All of the presidential candidates (with the possible exception of Herman Cain) come to New Hampshire on their “best behavior” (including present company). We aim to please, we aim to promise and we aim to profit from our pleasing and promising. That’s politics.



But the presidency is not about “politics.” The presidency is where the rubber hits the road. The presidency is a crucible where leaders are tested beyond the limits of expectation and endurance. Barack Obama thought it would be nice to live in “public housing” for four or eight years, living la vida loca in the White House, enjoying the benefits of the presidency and cementing his financial future some day as a former president. Obama is learning that the White House is not a resort hotel and, in Gingrich’s case, it is not a retirement home.



Did the Union leader look into the way Gingrich siphons cash from tax-exempt organizations into his own profit-making pockets? No. Did they look into how Gingrich “makes his money?” No. (McQuaid apparently accepted Gingrich’s nonsense that Newton is a “job-creator.”) Did the Union Leader do any investigative journalism before issuing an endorsement? No. In effect the Union Leader just casually tossed off an endorsement in the presidential primary with no meaningful research and reflection.



The Union Leader manifested contempt for its conservative New Hampshire roots and values, and contempt for the American people that look to New Hampshire for guidance in presidential politics.



None of the current presidential candidates have led perfect lives. (In Obama's case we don't even know yet who he really is.) I have been involved in controversy from time to time, usually as a result of exposing corruption. The New York Times’ dirt diggers ran a fine tooth comb over my life in 2008 and were forced to use thirty and forty year-old smut to schmutz me up as best they could (the effort failed).



Gingrich on the other hand has led an official life, a public life that is essentially one ongoing ethical violation and corruption of the tax laws. Gingrich’s corruption is a time bomb waiting to explode at the Republican National Convention.



And guess what? I knew David Axelrod way back when he was a beat reporter for the Chicago Tribune, back when Barack Obama was still living in Honolulu. Axelrod is probably salivating at the prospect of goofy Republicans and two-faced evangelic Christians nominating a crook for the presidency. Axelrod is a master dirt-digger. When Ax reads these remarks he will be smiling. The Ax knows I have been investigating and exposing crooked politicians in Illinois since the 1960’s. Axelrod knows that he would cook Gingrich's goose in a heartbeat if Gingrich won the nomination. Republicans would be humiliated.



Can this country really take four more years of Barack Obama? McQuaid and his coterie do not seem to have thought of the implications of their casually tossing off a presidential endorsement of a Republican crook to lead the party. That’s why the Union Leader’s endorsement of Newton Gingrich is a humiliation to New Hampshire residents and a disgrace to the honorable traditions of New Hampshire’s presidential primary.



With all due respect, I became a candidate for president because I had the qualifications necessary in a conservative candidate. My record of corruption-fighting is unique in national politics. My foreign experience and my experience in Washington have trained me how to do right, not how to do wrong. Nevertheless, being a second-tier presidential candidate as I am is a thankless task. It’s not easy. But I will continue to campaign for myself and campaign against Newt Gingrich because a President Gingrich would represent evil incarnate for the American people.



The Union Leader ought to be ashamed of its endorsement. I am not ashamed to tell the truth abut Gingrich and to continue the battle against this bold-faced liar and crook.



Watch for my anti-Gingrich TV and radio ads which have been prepared and which will begin airing in New Hampshire next week.



--------------------------



MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329
E-MAIL: Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com



ujntsman wasd reelected in November, 2008. A few monrths later he resigned to serve
his president,” Barack Obama. SDo whyh was it so terrible that Palin resigned and Hutsman served evenless of his secondterm? Can I say “double standard” again.



What os this show us? Whetyher thessue s resigfnaitonsor religion,th emedia shamlessly create double standards tgo favr theiiberal medioa pets (fulldisclosure; I am ot aliberalmedia pet).


--------------------------


Please Donate:



www.AndyMartinforPresident.com


--------------------------


LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):



http://www.unionleader.com/article/20111127/NEWS/711279999



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/


post/gingrichs-endorsement-and-the-failings-of-


the-conservative-media/2011/11/27/gIQAPIc81N_blog.html



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-


2012/post/new-hampshire-union-leader-endorses-


newt-gingrich-will-it-help-him/2011/11/27/gIQAlISI2N_blog.html?hpid=z11


--------------------------


ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago. His mom was born in Manchester. Growing up, Andy spent summers in New Hampshire. That’s why he’s New Hampshire’s “Favorite Son” presidential candidate in the 2012 presidential primary election.



Today Andy is a legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. Chicago Public Radio calls Andy a “boisterous Internet activist.” The Chicago Tribune calls him “Chicago’s own…political activist.” He has over forty years of background in radio and television. He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and he produced the Internet film "Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and international events with more than four decades of investigative and analytical experience both in the USA and around the world.



Andy has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois and American politics and courts for over forty years. [www.AndyMartin.com] He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.EnglishforAmerica.org



He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

UPDATES:
www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com.


ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com



[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]


--------------------------


© Copyright by Andy Martin 2011 – All Rights Reserved


--------------------------