Republican presidential candidate Andy Martin is also a
constitutional scholar who has studied and litigated constitutional law for
over 45 years. Andy responds to the “great constitutional debate” triggered by
Donald Trump’s views on illegal immigration. Andy completely supports Trump’s
view that “anchor babies” can be denied citizenship under the Fourteenth
Amendment. In fact, Andy issued a public statement on that precise issue in 2007, supporting Trump’s current
arguments. Because of his unique personal history of extensive experience in the
areas of law, politics, foreign policy and business, Andy’s views as a
candidate/author add a unique perspective to the 2016 presidential election.
COMING NEXT , SOON: (Yes,
a delayed column) Andy analyzes the impact of Donald Trump on the Republican
Party; some thoughts for Reince Priebus
News
from:
ANDY MARTIN /2016
Republican candidate for
President of the United States
“Make America Great Again”
www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
National headquarters:
Tel. (866) 706-2639; Cell (917)
664-9329
Fax (866) 214-3210
E-mail:
Andy@AndyMartinforPresident.com
Blogs:
www.AndyforPresident.blogspot.com
www.AndyforPresident.wordpress.com
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Republican
presidential candidate and constitutional scholar Andy Martin has been writing
about illegal immigration and “anchor babies” since 2007
Andy
says that Donald Trump has forever changed the compass of the immigration
debate in the United States
In
the second of his “Letters From the 2016 Presidential Campaign” Andy explains
why illegal immigration can and must be stopped
Andy
welcomes the “great constitutional debate” that has been triggered by Donald
Trump
To become a regular
subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and
place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line
(Please feel free to forward and/or
post this email)
(New York )(August 20, 2015 ) Dear American:
Donald Trump has triggered a great national debate on
illegal and legal immigration. In the following comments I endorse Trump’s
claim that a constitutional amendment is not required to eliminate automatic citizenship
for the children of illegal aliens, or so-called “anchor babies.”
1. Trump has triggered a worthy constitutional debate
As I said last week in Washington ,
I wear two hats in this presidential race. I am a dark horse candidate, but
doing no worse than the half dozen or so similarly situated candidates who are
near “0” but are still treated by the national media as though they have a
chance of winning.
And I come to the campaign table with a long and extensive
resume of experience in the real world, from foreign policy to fighting
political corruption to advocating for an end to illegal immigration. Like
Donald Trump I contemplated the prospect of building a family real estate
fortune. But unlike Donald I took what Robert Frost called “the [road] less
traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” And as is so often the case
when I look at Trump-the-candidate, I see someone who might have enjoyed living
the unconventional life I did.
One of my areas of interest has been constitutional
litigation and scholarship. I have studied the illegal immigration crisis for a
long time, ever since Senator Edward “Ted” Kennedy in 1965 worked to pass an
immigration law that would radically change the ethnicity of the United
States .
Thus I was absolutely delighted when Donald Trump decided to
issue his first policy paper on immigration and the illegal immigration crisis.
Trump has triggered a “great national debate” on constitutional law concerning
citizenship and immigration.
Wednesday night, MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell was citing
the 1845 common law case of Lynch v. Clark (please see
link [1] below) to justify the legality of anchor babies. What O’Donnell did
not realize is that both Congress and the states are free to change the common
law, and that the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress extensive powers to
legislate in the area of citizenship. (For example, the United
States inherited “common law” marriage; all
of the states have since repealed that status.)
But whether you support my views and Trump’s views, or
endorse opposing views, I think it is wonderful that Americans are having this
national debate. That’s what elections are for. We will be a stronger nation
for having thrashed these issues out in the national arena.
2. Should the GOP be afraid of Hispanic threats to retaliate?
I spent many years with the Florida Republican Party.
Hispanics are an integral part of the party's base. Republicans are not even
remotely anti-Hispanic or anti-Latino merely because we support secure borders
and strict citizenship requirements.
The media and the Democratic Party’s illegal immigration
supporters are constantly warning Republicans that Latinos will take revenge at
the ballot box because Republicans seek to define and defend our national and
constitutional borders. Should Republicans be afraid?
If supporters of illegal immigration feel so antagonistic
towards America
and American values, they are not real Americans. Americans put America
first, not their former homelands. People who support breaking our immigration
laws are no better than people who support robbing banks. In both instance they
are supporting criminal acts. Respect for the law and for our constitutional
values is a cornerstone of American citizenship.
Republicans may be risking a Latino backlash, but Latinos
are also risking a massive American backlash. Barack Obama has already
delivered Republican majorities in the House and Senate to Republicans. I am
confident the White House will be next.
American citizens and legal residents of Latino heritage or
indeed any heritage should be strong supporters of our immigration laws and
traditions. The place to change immigration laws is in Congress, not on the Rio
Grande River .
People who support illegal immigration and threaten retaliation on Election Day
are admitting they do not have the support of the American People to lawfully
change our laws.
3. My own writing on “anchor babies”
Here is what I wrote eight
years ago in 2007 on anchor babies (see link [2] for my full statement):
“I have researched the applicable law in detail, and the
legal issues are complex. But I am convinced that Congress has the power to
override Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), which
was itself only a 5-4 decision. Thus, even on the Supreme Court an issue
analogous to anchor babies was a closely divided matter.
“Illegals present in the United States are at best
‘visitors.’ They enjoy the protection of U. S. laws, but that
does not necessarily mean they are automatically entitled to create citizenship
for children that are born during their visits. I don’t think, for example,
that Mexico grants automatic
citizenship to children that are accidentally born there to visitors or
tourists.
“The Fourteenth Amendment grants Congress broad powers
under section 5. The Supreme Court has shown great deference to congressional
enactments in the area of citizenship and naturalization, as indeed it must
under Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. Clearly under the legal doctrine
of ‘original intent’ the several states did not intend by adoption of the
Fourteenth Amendment to grant citizenship to the children of persons who had
entered the United States illegally.
“A federal statute would, in order to be constitutional, operate
prospectively, i.e. in the future. Congress does not have the power to revoke
citizenship that may have been granted under existing interpretations of the
law.
“But by removing the anchor baby incentive for illegal
immigration we would cut off future Arellano travesties, where someone gives
birth to create an anchor for continued illegal presence in the United States .”
Obviously, I have studied the
constitutional issues involving illegal immigration for a long time. And I have
also presented carefully crafted solutions to end the anchor baby crisis. Unlike
the many cable TV bobbleheads who pop off on the issue of anchor babies, I have
given the situation a constitutionally nuanced review. I am convinced a
constitutional amendment is not necessary and that Donald Trump’s views on that
point are correct.
4. Trump overlooked the growing “birth tourism” scandal
Ironically, in seeking to explain the extent of the current immigration
crisis Trump did not even mention “birth tourism.” Birth tourism occurs when
someone comes to the United States with the specific intent to give birth and
create American citizenship, see link [3] below. Are you outraged by birth
tourism, or do you think it is a great idea that foreigners come here on a
tourist visa to give birth? Let me know, and let Donald Trump know. Tell him
“Andy sent me.”
5. Where do we go from here?
Trump has changed forever the trajectory of immigration
reform in Congress. The flaccid Republican congressional leadership will have
to adopt a more aggressive approach, or congressional leaders will be removed
in 2017.
Jeb Bush’s political pedigree as a self-styled Mexican-American
has been demolished. Bush is no longer a credible candidate for the Republican
Party presidential nomination, whether Trump prevails or not. Bush is finished
as a potential national leader of the Republican Party.
Because Trump has created what will evolve into a new
Republican “base line” on immigration, whether he wins the nomination or not,
he has changed the future of politics in this country. As immigration activists
continue to agitate for the United States
to surrender its sovereignty to an uncontrolled invasion of foreigners from Mexico ,
Central America and other parts of the world, an
American “backlash” is emerging to fight the proponents of unlimited illegal
immigration. Trump is making what was once thought to be “unthinkable” and
“impossible,” thinkable and possible: secure borders and an end to illegal
alien birthright citizenship.
Americans are striking back and taking back their nation
from the tide of illegal immigration and those internal saboteurs who are
striving to subsume the United States in a Third World morass.
LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not
just the underlined portion):
[1]
[2]
[3]
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-36000-foreign-birth-tourists-here-to-make-u.s.-babies/article/2563721
New citations
after emailing:
WHAT OTHERS SAY ABOUT ANDY MARTIN:
One author has
called Andy Martin the “big kahuna” of the anti-[Barack] Obama movement.
Another said “Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to
online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film:
sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…” Another says,
“The only American journalists that are ‘standing UP’ [to Obama] are, Andy
Martin…”
ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO :
Andy Martin is a
legendary New Hampshire , New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author,
Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster
and media critic. With forty-seven years of background in radio and television
and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington , the USA and around the world, Andy provides
insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a
full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com;
also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm
Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American
politics and courts for over forty-five years and is executive director of the
National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.
He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law
and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York
(LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).
He is the author
of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the
Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the
Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com
and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.
Andy’s family
immigrated to Manchester , New
Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where
he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire ’s leading corruption fighter and
Republican Party reformer.
UPDATES:
www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin
Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com
[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]
© Copyright by
Andy Martin 2015 – All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment